Home / Industrial & Scientific / Inline Strainers

Neoperl 13 0980 5 Standard Flow Cache Perlator HC Aerator, Tiny Junior Size, 2.2 GPM, Red Dome, Honeycomb Screen, Aerated Stream, M18.5 x 1 Threads, Plastic, 0.553

Neoperl 13 0980 5 Standard Flow Cache Perlator HC Aerator, Tiny Junior Size, 2.2 GPM, Red Dome, Honeycomb Screen, Aerated Stream, M18.5 x 1 Threads, Plastic, 0.553" Height

Customer rating ★★★★★ 4 stars

Imported from USA | Ships in 10 working days

5% additional discount on UPI | Cash On Delivery available

1

₹4550 -34% ₹3000/-

The price at cart2india.com is inclusive of custom duties, GST, freight forwarding and other charges.

Proceed to Pay

Free Shipping across India. Powered by BlueDart.
EMI and GST Invoice available.

Product Information


Specification
Binding : Misc.
Brand : Neoperl
Color : Red
Label : Neoperl
Manufacturer : Neoperl
MaterialType : Plastic
Model : 13 0980 5
NumberOfItems : 1
PackageDimensions_Weight : 0.05070632026
PackageDimensions : L:1.4960629906 X W:0.9842519675 X H:0.5118110231
PartNumber : 13 0980 5
ProductGroup : BISS Basic
ProductTypeName : FAUCET_WATER_AERATOR
Publisher : Neoperl
SmallImage_Height : 75
SmallImage_URL : https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/4148o6Ua2nL._SL75_.jpg
SmallImage_Width : 75
Studio : Neoperl
Title : Neoperl 13 0980 5 Standard Flow Cache Perlator HC Aerator, Tiny Junior Size, 2.2 GPM, Red Dome, Honeycomb Screen, Aerated Stream, M18.5 x 1 Threads, Plastic, 0.553" Height
Weight : 0.1
WeightUnit : pounds

Questions & Answers

Have a question? Ask experts

?
No question found

Ratings & Review

Rating Breakdown (average)

5*
3
4*
4
3*
3
2*
0
1*
0

Read all 10 customer reviews

IÕd consider buying again.

★★★★★

Meets expectations, good buy.

★★★★★

Very functional and easy to use.

★★★★★

Remarkably good and exceeded all expectations.

★★★★★

One of the best things IÕve ever bought.

★★★★★

Highly recommended for everyone.

★★★★★

Quality is fine, but packaging was average.

★★★★★

Solid build and decent design.

★★★★★

Quality is fine, but packaging was average.

★★★★★

It's usable but lacks some key features.

★★★★★

Have an opinion on this page? Let's hear it.