Home / Arts, Crafts & Sewing / Foil

Chocolate Candy Wrappers Aluminium Foil Paper Wrapping Papers,200 Pack Extra-Large Square Sweets Lolly Paper Food Candy Tin Foil Wrappers for Candy Packaging Decoration (7.87 x 7.87 In)

Chocolate Candy Wrappers Aluminium Foil Paper Wrapping Papers,200 Pack Extra-Large Square Sweets Lolly Paper Food Candy Tin Foil Wrappers for Candy Packaging Decoration (7.87 x 7.87 In)

Customer rating ★★★★★☆ 4.8 stars

Imported from USA | Ships in 10 working days

5% additional discount on UPI | Cash On Delivery available

1

₹5980 -33% ₹4000/-

The price at cart2india.com is inclusive of custom duties, GST, freight forwarding and other charges.

Proceed to Pay

Free Shipping across India. Powered by BlueDart.
EMI and GST Invoice available.

Product Information


Specification
Brand : Coobbar
Color : Gold
Label : Coobbar
Manufacturer : Coobbar
PackageDimensions_Weight : 0.62831744670
PackageDimensions : L:5.9055118050 X W:5.9055118050 X H:0.1968503935
PartNumber : CB-IKMNVFRWQS
ProductGroup : Kitchen
ProductTypeName : FOOD_WRAP
Publisher : Coobbar
Size : generic
SmallImage_Height : 75
SmallImage_URL : https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51J0xBLwSWL._SL75_.jpg
SmallImage_Width : 75
Studio : Coobbar
Title : Chocolate Candy Wrappers Aluminium Foil Paper Wrapping Papers,200 Pack Extra-Large Square Sweets Lolly Paper Food Candy Tin Foil Wrappers for Candy Packaging Decoration (7.87 x 7.87 In)
Weight : 0.6
WeightUnit : pounds

Questions & Answers

Have a question? Ask experts

?
No question found

Ratings & Review

Rating Breakdown (average)

5*
7
4*
2
3*
0
2*
0
1*
0

Read all 9 customer reviews

IÕm extremely impressed with this item.

★★★★★

Impressive quality and durability.

★★★★★

Remarkably good and exceeded all expectations.

★★★★★

Totally worth every penny.

★★★★★

CanÕt believe how great this is.

★★★★★

Will be purchasing again soon.

★★★★★

Solid build and decent design.

★★★★★

Highly recommended for everyone.

★★★★★

Very useful and nicely packaged.

★★★★★

Have an opinion on this page? Let's hear it.